[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202305110927.12508719D2@keescook>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 09:32:31 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
"linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSD: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 02:47:54PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> Hello Azeem -
>
> > On May 10, 2023, at 3:09 PM, Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first.
> > This read may exceed the destination size limit.
> > This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read
> > overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1].
> > In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace
> > strlcpy() here with strscpy().
> > No return values were used, so direct replacement is safe.
>
> Actually netid should use the __string() and __assign_str()
> macros rather than open-coding a string copy, I think.
Ah, hm, yeah, this is tracing wrappers.
Steve, is there a reason __assign_str() is using "strcpy" and not
strscpy()?
> Fixes: 3c92fba557c6 ("NFSD: Enhance the nfsd_cb_setup tracepoint")
Yeah, that works. I was on the fence about adding Fixes for these kinds
of refactoring. Like, it's not really _broken_; we're just trying to
remove the API.
> > Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/trace.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/trace.h b/fs/nfsd/trace.h
> > index 4183819ea082..9b32cda54808 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/trace.h
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/trace.h
> > @@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(nfsd_cb_setup,
> > TP_fast_assign(
> > __entry->cl_boot = clp->cl_clientid.cl_boot;
> > __entry->cl_id = clp->cl_clientid.cl_id;
> > - strlcpy(__entry->netid, netid, sizeof(__entry->netid));
> > + strscpy(__entry->netid, netid, sizeof(__entry->netid));
> > __entry->authflavor = authflavor;
> > __assign_sockaddr(addr, &clp->cl_cb_conn.cb_addr,
> > clp->cl_cb_conn.cb_addrlen)
Leaving code context for Steve to see...
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists