lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202305121126.E5AD334AA3@keescook>
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2023 11:27:35 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump, vmcore: Set p_align to 4 for PT_NOTE

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 02:25:28AM +0000, Fangrui Song wrote:
> Tools like readelf/llvm-readelf use p_align to parse a PT_NOTE program
> header as an array of 4-byte entries or 8-byte entries. Currently, there
> are workarounds[1] in place for Linux to treat p_align==0 as 4. However,
> it would be more appropriate to set the correct alignment so that tools
> do not have to rely on guesswork. FreeBSD coredumps set p_align to 4 as
> well.
>
> [1]: https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=82ed9683ec099d8205dc499ac84febc975235af6

The interesting bit from here is:

  /* NB: Some note sections may have alignment value of 0 or 1.  gABI
     specifies that notes should be aligned to 4 bytes in 32-bit
     objects and to 8 bytes in 64-bit objects.  As a Linux extension,
     we also support 4 byte alignment in 64-bit objects.  If section
     alignment is less than 4, we treate alignment as 4 bytes.   */
  if (align < 4)
    align = 4;
  else if (align != 4 && align != 8)
    {
      warn (_("Corrupt note: alignment %ld, expecting 4 or 8\n"),
           (long) align);
      return FALSE;
    }

Should Linux use 8 for 64-bit processes to avoid the other special case?

(And do we need to make some changes to make sure we are actually
aligned?)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ