| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230512205257.080801387@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 23:07:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>,
Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sabin Rapan <sabrapan@...zon.com>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
Subject: [patch V4 30/37] cpu/hotplug: Provide a split up CPUHP_BRINGUP mechanism
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
The bring up logic of a to be onlined CPU consists of several parts, which
are considered to be a single hotplug state:
1) Control CPU issues the wake-up
2) To be onlined CPU starts up, does the minimal initialization,
reports to be alive and waits for release into the complete bring-up.
3) Control CPU waits for the alive report and releases the upcoming CPU
for the complete bring-up.
Allow to split this into two states:
1) Control CPU issues the wake-up
After that the to be onlined CPU starts up, does the minimal
initialization, reports to be alive and waits for release into the
full bring-up. As this can run after the control CPU dropped the
hotplug locks the code which is executed on the AP before it reports
alive has to be carefully audited to not violate any of the hotplug
constraints, especially not modifying any of the various cpumasks.
This is really only meant to avoid waiting for the AP to react on the
wake-up. Of course an architecture can move strict CPU related setup
functionality, e.g. microcode loading, with care before the
synchronization point to save further pointless waiting time.
2) Control CPU waits for the alive report and releases the upcoming CPU
for the complete bring-up.
This allows that the two states can be split up to run all to be onlined
CPUs up to state #1 on the control CPU and then at a later point run state
#2. This spares some of the latencies of the full serialized per CPU
bringup by avoiding the per CPU wakeup/wait serialization. The assumption
is that the first AP already waits when the last AP has been woken up. This
obvioulsy depends on the hardware latencies and depending on the timings
this might still not completely eliminate all wait scenarios.
This split is just a preparatory step for enabling the parallel bringup
later. The boot time bringup is still fully serialized. It has a separate
config switch so that architectures which want to support parallel bringup
can test the split of the CPUHP_BRINGUG step separately.
To enable this the architecture must support the CPU hotplug core sync
mechanism and has to be audited that there are no implicit hotplug state
dependencies which require a fully serialized bringup.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
---
arch/Kconfig | 4 ++
include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 4 ++
kernel/cpu.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ config HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_FULL
select HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_DEAD if HOTPLUG_CPU
select HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC
+config HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP
+ bool
+ select HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_FULL
+
config GENERIC_ENTRY
bool
--- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
CPUHP_MIPS_SOC_PREPARE,
CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN,
CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN_END = CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN + 20,
+ CPUHP_BP_KICK_AP,
CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU,
/*
@@ -517,9 +518,12 @@ void cpuhp_online_idle(enum cpuhp_state
static inline void cpuhp_online_idle(enum cpuhp_state state) { }
#endif
+struct task_struct;
+
void cpuhp_ap_sync_alive(void);
void arch_cpuhp_sync_state_poll(void);
void arch_cpuhp_cleanup_kick_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
+int arch_cpuhp_kick_ap_alive(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle);
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CORE_SYNC_DEAD
void cpuhp_ap_report_dead(void);
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -761,6 +761,47 @@ static int bringup_wait_for_ap_online(un
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP
+static int cpuhp_kick_ap_alive(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ if (!cpuhp_can_boot_ap(cpu))
+ return -EAGAIN;
+
+ return arch_cpuhp_kick_ap_alive(cpu, idle_thread_get(cpu));
+}
+
+static int cpuhp_bringup_ap(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st = per_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state, cpu);
+ int ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Some architectures have to walk the irq descriptors to
+ * setup the vector space for the cpu which comes online.
+ * Prevent irq alloc/free across the bringup.
+ */
+ irq_lock_sparse();
+
+ ret = cpuhp_bp_sync_alive(cpu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ ret = bringup_wait_for_ap_online(cpu);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
+ irq_unlock_sparse();
+
+ if (st->target <= CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE)
+ return 0;
+
+ return cpuhp_kick_ap(cpu, st, st->target);
+
+out_unlock:
+ irq_unlock_sparse();
+ return ret;
+}
+#else
static int bringup_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st = per_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state, cpu);
@@ -781,7 +822,6 @@ static int bringup_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
*/
irq_lock_sparse();
- /* Arch-specific enabling code. */
ret = __cpu_up(cpu, idle);
if (ret)
goto out_unlock;
@@ -805,6 +845,7 @@ static int bringup_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
irq_unlock_sparse();
return ret;
}
+#endif
static int finish_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
{
@@ -1944,13 +1985,38 @@ static struct cpuhp_step cpuhp_hp_states
.startup.single = timers_prepare_cpu,
.teardown.single = timers_dead_cpu,
},
- /* Kicks the plugged cpu into life */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_SPLIT_STARTUP
+ /*
+ * Kicks the AP alive. AP will wait in cpuhp_ap_sync_alive() until
+ * the next step will release it.
+ */
+ [CPUHP_BP_KICK_AP] = {
+ .name = "cpu:kick_ap",
+ .startup.single = cpuhp_kick_ap_alive,
+ },
+
+ /*
+ * Waits for the AP to reach cpuhp_ap_sync_alive() and then
+ * releases it for the complete bringup.
+ */
+ [CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU] = {
+ .name = "cpu:bringup",
+ .startup.single = cpuhp_bringup_ap,
+ .teardown.single = finish_cpu,
+ .cant_stop = true,
+ },
+#else
+ /*
+ * All-in-one CPU bringup state which includes the kick alive.
+ */
[CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU] = {
.name = "cpu:bringup",
.startup.single = bringup_cpu,
.teardown.single = finish_cpu,
.cant_stop = true,
},
+#endif
/* Final state before CPU kills itself */
[CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD] = {
.name = "idle:dead",
Powered by blists - more mailing lists