[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZF4e8YdAqHwmONzS@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 14:11:45 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: dinh.nguyen@...ux.intel.com, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
dinguyen@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/6] hwmon: (socfpga) Add hardware monitoring support
on SoCFPGA platforms
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 08:57:26AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/05/2023 23:28, dinh.nguyen@...ux.intel.com wrote:
...
> > + struct device_node *child;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> > + ret = socfpga_probe_child_from_dt(dev, child, priv);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + of_node_put(child);
>
> Hm, and if the loop does not break, is this still correct?
Yes, since NULL is okay for of_node_put(). However the explicit call inside the
if (ret) can be more obvious on what's going on.
> > + return ret;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists