[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a1beef0bc605756f8a45acf86f6bb58c188ae21.camel@web.de>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 15:04:00 +0200
From: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@....de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Subject: IPA_STATUS_SIZE, commit b8dc7d0eea5a7709bb534f1b3ca70d2d7de0b42c
commit b8dc7d0eea5a7709bb534f1b3ca70d2d7de0b42c
Author: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Date: Wed Jan 25 14:45:39 2023 -0600
net: ipa: stop using sizeof(status)
The IPA packet status structure changes in IPA v5.0 in ways that
are
difficult to represent cleanly. As a small step toward redefining
it as a parsed block of data, use a constant to define its size,
rather than the size of the IPA status structure type.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
introduced the IPA_STATUS_SIZE constant as a replacent for
sizeof(struct ipa_status). IPA_STATUS_SIZE is defined as
sizeof(__le32[4]), but sizeof(struct ipa_status) = sizeof(__le32[8])
and the newly introducded ipa_status_extract operates on 8 __le32
words, so I wondered if IPA_STATUS_SIZE is correct.
Bert Karwatzki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists