lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b18e6ed-bce0-44f5-5ec4-8903f3c85cfe@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2023 08:58:11 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, hch@....de, tj@...nel.org,
        josef@...icpanda.com, yukuai3@...wei.com
Cc:     lukas.bulwahn@...il.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2 0/6] blk-wbt: minor fix and cleanup

On 5/12/23 3:35 AM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  - make the code more readable for patch 1
>  - add a new attr_group that is only visible for rq based device
>  - explain in detail for patch 4
>  - add review tag for patch 2,3,5
> 
> Yu Kuai (6):
>   blk-wbt: fix that wbt can't be disabled by default
>   blk-wbt: don't create wbt sysfs entry if CONFIG_BLK_WBT is disabled
>   blk-wbt: remove dead code to handle wbt enable/disable with io
>     inflight
>   blk-wbt: cleanup rwb_enabled() and wbt_disabled()
>   blk-iocost: move wbt_enable/disable_default() out of spinlock
>   blk-sysfs: add a new attr_group for blk_mq
> 
>  block/blk-iocost.c |   7 +-
>  block/blk-sysfs.c  | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  block/blk-wbt.c    |  33 +++------
>  block/blk-wbt.h    |  19 -----
>  4 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)

We need a 6.4 version of the fix to get rid of the regression. If you
want to do cleanups on top of that, then that's fine and that can go into
6.5. But don't mix them up.

-- 
Jens Axboe


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ