linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] Venus QoL / maintainability fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9904e82-4756-2add-3c7e-e019ce966515@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2023 04:01:19 +0100
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
        Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Dikshita Agarwal <dikshita@....qualcomm.com>,
        Mansur Alisha Shaik <mansur@...eaurora.org>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Dikshita Agarwal <quic_dikshita@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] Venus QoL / maintainability fixes

On 04/05/2023 09:00, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Tested on 8250, but pretty please test it on your boards too!

What's the definition of test here ?

I ran this

ffplay -codec:video h264_v4l2m2m FantasticFour-ROTSS.mp4

and this

ffplay -codec:video vp8_v4l2m2m /mnt/big-buck-bunny_trailer.webm

on db410c with no errors. Then again I applied and disapplied the 8x8 
264 fix to that branch and saw no discernable difference so I'm not very 
confident we have good coverage.

@Stan @Vikash could you give some suggested tests for coverage here ?

@Konrad - get a db410c !

My superficial first-pass on this series looks good but, before giving a 
Tested-by here, I think we should define a set of coverage tests, run 
them - the upper end on sm8250 and lower end msm8916 "makes sense to me"

20? different gstreamer tests at different formats and different sizes 
on our selected platforms db410c, rb5, rb3 I have - also an 820 I 
haven't booted and an enforce sdm660.

Which tests will we use to validate this series and subsequent series to 
ensure we don't have more regressions ?

---
bod