[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230512162712.GB18400@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 17:27:12 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, ardb@...nel.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, luto@...capital.net,
nivedita@...m.mit.edu, kanth.ghatraju@...cle.com,
trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/14] x86: Secure Launch kernel early boot stub
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 12:17:50PM -0400, Ross Philipson wrote:
> I am not 100% sure what you are asking but we also measure the EFI memory
> map. This comment is just to note that if the e820 exceeded the space in the
> fixed map in boot parameters, we would pick up any extra entries when
> measuring the setup_data list.
Ack, picked this up in a later patch but didn't come back to follow up.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists