[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <525d7b15-ffbd-22d9-7ad5-0a0ff7290620@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 11:33:00 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: m.szyprowski@...sung.com, andrzej.hajda@...el.com,
mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org, dillon.minfei@...il.com,
david.plowman@...pberrypi.com, mark.rutland@....com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, andi@...zian.org,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, aswani.reddy@...sung.com,
pankaj.dubey@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v7] dt-bindings: media: s5p-mfc: convert bindings to
json-schema
On 11/05/2023 11:34, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org]
>> Sent: 28 March 2023 20:06
>> To: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@...sung.com>; linux-arm-
>> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-media@...r.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: m.szyprowski@...sung.com; andrzej.hajda@...el.com;
>> mchehab@...nel.org; hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl;
>> ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar; jernej.skrabec@...il.com;
>> benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org;
>> stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org; dillon.minfei@...il.com;
>> david.plowman@...pberrypi.com; mark.rutland@....com;
>> robh+dt@...nel.org; krzk+dt@...nel.org; andi@...zian.org;
>> alim.akhtar@...sung.com; aswani.reddy@...sung.com;
>> pankaj.dubey@...sung.com
>> Subject: Re: [Patch v7] dt-bindings: media: s5p-mfc: convert bindings to json-
>> schema
>>
>> On 28/03/2023 13:47, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
>>> Convert s5p-mfc bindings to DT schema format using json-schema.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain@...sung.com>
>>> ---
>>> changes since v6:
>>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>> versions. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the
>> tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for acks received on the version
>> they apply.
>>
>> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=03601d03-62eb0848-0361964c-
>> 74fe485fb305-ca0023b5279dd925&q=1&e=9490b51d-9547-4566-bb76-
>> 8c1401745ae1&u=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Fv5.17%2Fs
>> ource%2FDocumentation%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-patches.rst%23L540
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> I don’t see this patch in linux-next. It's been more than a month now.
> Please let me know if any other changes required.
I already provided you review tag.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists