linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] drivers: watchdog: Replace GPL license notice with SPDX identifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ef31b33f-8e66-4194-37e3-916b53cf7088@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 13 May 2023 17:52:51 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linux SPDX Licenses <linux-spdx@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Staging Drivers <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Linux Watchdog Devices <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Actions <linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Diederik de Haas <didi.debian@...ow.org>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
        Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
        Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Sam Creasey <sammy@...my.net>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Ray Lehtiniemi <rayl@...l.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Andrey Panin <pazke@...pac.ru>, Oleg Drokin <green@...mea.edu>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>,
        Sylver Bruneau <sylver.bruneau@...glemail.com>,
        Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@....com>,
        Denis Turischev <denis@...pulab.co.il>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] drivers: watchdog: Replace GPL license notice
 with SPDX identifier

On 5/12/23 19:46, Richard Fontana wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 6:07 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sb_wdog.c b/drivers/watchdog/sb_wdog.c
>> index 504be461f992a9..822bf8905bf3ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sb_wdog.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sb_wdog.c
>> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-1.0+
>>  /*
>>   * Watchdog driver for SiByte SB1 SoCs
>>   *
>> @@ -38,10 +39,6 @@
>>   *     (c) Copyright 1996 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
>>   *                                             All Rights Reserved.
>>   *
>> - *     This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> - *     modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
>> - *     version 1 or 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> 
> Shouldn't this be
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-1.0 OR GPL-2.0
> (or in current SPDX notation GPL-1.0-only OR GPL-2.0-only) ?
> 

Nope, as it will fail spdxcheck.py. Also, SPDX specification [1]
doesn't have negation operator (NOT), thus the licensing requirement
on the above notice can't be expressed reliably in SPDX here.

[1]: https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.3/SPDX-license-expressions/

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara