linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: st,lsm6dsx: reference common schema for mount-matrix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b179185a-0aa8-e58c-4fe0-4b83396ef30e@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 13 May 2023 20:10:40 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Campello <campello@...omium.org>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: st,lsm6dsx: reference common schema
 for mount-matrix

On 13/05/2023 20:13, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2023 22:06:56 +0100
> Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Reference iio.yaml schema from dtschema to allow already used
>>> mount-matrix property:
>>>
>>>   msm8953-xiaomi-daisy.dtb: imu@6a: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('mount-matrix' was unexpected)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>  
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Conor.
> 
> Krzysztof,
> 
> These look fine to me, but I guess I should wait for the
> dt-schema patch to land before taking them?

You can grab first patch independently. #2 and #3 should indeed wait a
bit for Rob's ack. They do not have any conflicts but they will fix
nothing without dtschema patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof