lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZF7fJlQM4KmenDkC@moria.home.lan>
Date:   Fri, 12 May 2023 20:51:50 -0400
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/32] locking: SIX locks (shared/intent/exclusive)

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 05:45:18PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 08:17:23PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 04:49:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 5/12/23 16:26, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 12:39:34AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday 2023-05-12 22:58, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > >>> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 02:14:08PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > > >>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> The currently SPDX list only knows "GPL-2.0-only" or "GPL-2.0-or-later",
> > > >>>> please edit.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Where is that list?
> > > >>
> > > >> I just went to spdx.org and then chose "License List" from the
> > > >> horizontal top bar menu.
> > > > 
> > > > Do we have anything more official? Quick grep through the source tree
> > > > says I'm following accepted usage.
> > > 
> > > Documentation/process/license-rules.rst points to spdx.org for
> > > further info.
> > > 
> > > or LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 contains this:
> > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > > Valid-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > > SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html
> > 
> > Thanks, I'll leave it at GPL-2.0 then.
> 
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html says that GPL-2.0 is deprecated.  Its
> replacement is https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-only.html.  Yes, they mean the
> same thing, but the new names were introduced to be clearer than the old ones.

Perhaps updating LICENCES/preferred/GPL-2.0 is in order.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ