[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230512172618.1120ab4c1e6d3026081c20d9@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 17:26:18 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com>
Cc: luto@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
bristot@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fork: optimize memcg_charge_kernel_stack() a bit
On Mon, 8 May 2023 06:44:58 +0000 Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@...pee.com> wrote:
> Since commit f1c1a9ee00e4 ("fork: Move memcg_charge_kernel_stack()
> into CONFIG_VMAP_STACK"), memcg_charge_kernel_stack() has been moved
> into CONFIG_VMAP_STACK block, so the CONFIG_VMAP_STACK check can be
> removed.
>
> Furthermore, memcg_charge_kernel_stack() is only invoked by
> alloc_thread_stack_node() instead of dup_task_struct(). If
> memcg_kmem_charge_page() fails, the uncharge process is handled in
> memcg_charge_kernel_stack() itself instead of free_thread_stack(),
> so remove the incorrect comments.
>
> If memcg_charge_kernel_stack() fails to charge pages used by kernel
> stack, only charged pages need to be uncharged. It's unnecessary to
> uncharge those pages which memory cgroup pointer is NULL.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -250,23 +250,20 @@ static int memcg_charge_kernel_stack(struct vm_struct *vm)
> {
> int i;
> int ret;
> + int nr_charged = 0;
>
> - BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK) && PAGE_SIZE % 1024 != 0);
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE % 1024 != 0);
This check now deserves some sort of award. I'll remove it.
> BUG_ON(vm->nr_pages != THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE);
>
> for (i = 0; i < THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
> ret = memcg_kmem_charge_page(vm->pages[i], GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> if (ret)
> goto err;
> + nr_charged++;
> }
> return 0;
> err:
> - /*
> - * If memcg_kmem_charge_page() fails, page's memory cgroup pointer is
> - * NULL, and memcg_kmem_uncharge_page() in free_thread_stack() will
> - * ignore this page.
> - */
> - for (i = 0; i < THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_charged; i++)
> memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(vm->pages[i], 0);
> return ret;
We don't really need nr_charged - we could just do
while (--i >= 0)
but nr_charged is straightforward, which is always a good choice.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists