lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de3f41a0-b13d-d4f6-765a-19b857bce53e@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Sat, 13 May 2023 11:09:31 +0800
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@...iatek.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        stanley.chu@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
        chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, alice.chao@...iatek.com,
        powen.kao@...iatek.com, naomi.chu@...iatek.com,
        wsd_upstream@...iatek.com, "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ufs: don't use the fair tag sharings

Hi,

在 2023/05/13 2:12, Bart Van Assche 写道:
> The fair tag sharing algorithm has a negative impact on all SCSI devices 
> with multiple logical units. This is because logical units are 
> considered active until (request timeout) seconds have elapsed after the 
> logical unit stopped being used (see also the blk_mq_tag_idle() call in 
> blk_mq_timeout_work()). UFS users are hit by this because UFS 3.0 
> devices have a limited queue depth (32) and because power management 
> commands are submitted to a logical unit (WLUN). Hence, it happens often 
> that the block layer "active queue" counter is equal to 2 while only one 
> logical unit is being used actively (a logical unit backed by NAND 
> flash). The performance difference between queue depths 16 and 32 for 
> UFS devices is significant.

We meet similiar problem before, but I think remove tag fair sharing
might cause some problems, because get tag is not fair currently, for
example 2 devices share 32 tag, while device a issue large amount of
io concurrently, and device b only issue one io, in this case, if fair
tag sharing is removed, device b can get bad io latency.

By the way, I tried to propose a way to workaround this by following:

1) disable fair tag sharing untill get tag found no tag is avaiable;
2) enable fair tag sharing again if the disk donesn't faild to get tag
for a period of time;

Can this approch be considered?

Thanks,
Kuai

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ