[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230514165932.251200-1-sensor1010@163.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 00:59:32 +0800
From: Lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
To: linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] drivers/pinconf.c: Remove redundant check for the existence of the member
"pin_config_set" in pinconf_ops.
In the function of registering pinctrl_dev, pinctrl_init_controller(),
a non-null check has already been performed on the members
pin_config_set and pin_config_group_set in the ops structure.
Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c
index d9d54065472e..7b078d4ab61e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c
@@ -158,10 +158,6 @@ int pinconf_apply_setting(const struct pinctrl_setting *setting)
switch (setting->type) {
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN:
- if (!ops->pin_config_set) {
- dev_err(pctldev->dev, "missing pin_config_set op\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
ret = ops->pin_config_set(pctldev,
setting->data.configs.group_or_pin,
setting->data.configs.configs,
@@ -174,11 +170,6 @@ int pinconf_apply_setting(const struct pinctrl_setting *setting)
}
break;
case PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP:
- if (!ops->pin_config_group_set) {
- dev_err(pctldev->dev,
- "missing pin_config_group_set op\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
ret = ops->pin_config_group_set(pctldev,
setting->data.configs.group_or_pin,
setting->data.configs.configs,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists