[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202305141200.aaTHzYOJ-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 12:28:23 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, lukasz.luba@....com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
amit.kucheria@...durent.com, amit.kachhap@...il.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, Pierre.Gondois@....com,
ionela.voinescu@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/17] PM: EM: Introduce runtime modifiable table
Hi Lukasz,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/thermal linus/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lukasz-Luba/PM-EM-Refactor-em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies-arguments/20230512-180158
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230512095743.3393563-9-lukasz.luba%40arm.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 08/17] PM: EM: Introduce runtime modifiable table
config: arm64-randconfig-s041-20230514 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230514/202305141200.aaTHzYOJ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.4-39-gce1a6720-dirty
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/d12d8d1010d7b093d6b64c204d77484d6fc268ab
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Lukasz-Luba/PM-EM-Refactor-em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies-arguments/20230512-180158
git checkout d12d8d1010d7b093d6b64c204d77484d6fc268ab
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/power/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202305141200.aaTHzYOJ-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kernel/power/energy_model.c:472:13: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct em_perf_table *tmp @@ got struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *runtime_table @@
kernel/power/energy_model.c:472:13: sparse: expected struct em_perf_table *tmp
kernel/power/energy_model.c:472:13: sparse: got struct em_perf_table [noderef] __rcu *runtime_table
vim +472 kernel/power/energy_model.c
444
445 /**
446 * em_dev_unregister_perf_domain() - Unregister Energy Model (EM) for a device
447 * @dev : Device for which the EM is registered
448 *
449 * Unregister the EM for the specified @dev (but not a CPU device).
450 */
451 void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev)
452 {
453 struct em_perf_domain *pd;
454 struct em_perf_table *tmp;
455
456 if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev) || !dev->em_pd)
457 return;
458
459 if (_is_cpu_device(dev))
460 return;
461
462 pd = dev->em_pd;
463 /*
464 * The mutex separates all register/unregister requests and protects
465 * from potential clean-up/setup issues in the debugfs directories.
466 * The debugfs directory name is the same as device's name.
467 */
468 mutex_lock(&em_pd_mutex);
469
470 em_debug_remove_pd(dev);
471
> 472 tmp = pd->runtime_table;
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
Powered by blists - more mailing lists