[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <w6uswjuf7fiorrplqzhrpg3vrjbbdd3bgaxej5l6ez3pebn3d5@ytuxhim25j6q>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 23:46:32 +0200
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, robdclark@...il.com,
sean@...rly.run, swboyd@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...il.com,
agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com,
quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com, quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] drm/msm/dpu: add support for DSC encoder v1.2
engine
On 2023-05-12 21:19:19, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
<snip.
> > +static inline void dpu_hw_dsc_bind_pingpong_blk_1_2(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
> > + const enum dpu_pingpong pp)
> > +{
> > + struct dpu_hw_blk_reg_map *hw;
> > + const struct dpu_dsc_sub_blks *sblk;
> > + int mux_cfg = 0xf; /* Disabled */
> > +
> > + hw = &hw_dsc->hw;
> > +
> > + sblk = hw_dsc->caps->sblk;
> > +
> > + if (pp)
> > + mux_cfg = (pp - PINGPONG_0) & 0x7;
>
> Do we need an unbind support here like we do for the DSC 1.1?
>
> > +
> > + DPU_REG_WRITE(hw, sblk->ctl.base + DSC_CTL, mux_cfg);
> > +}
<snip>
Friendly request to strip/snip unneeded context (as done in this reply)
to make it easier to spot the conversation, and replies to it.
- Marijn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists