[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a032d9e6-6cb5-1856-9eda-28028bf05633@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 12:41:45 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>, treding@...dia.com,
dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
rafael@...nel.org, jonathanh@...dia.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, helgaas@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, mmaddireddy@...dia.com, kw@...ux.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, vidyas@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com,
ksitaraman@...dia.com, ishah@...dia.com, bbasu@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v8 0/8] Tegra234 Memory interconnect support
On 11/05/2023 19:32, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Have incorporated the suggestions in v7. Only changed 'patch 1' in v7
> to fix possible race when setting 'mc->bpmp' as pointed by Krzysztof.
> Requesting to merge the patch series.
>
Can I apply it since you request it? I asked you long time ago to
clearly state dependencies or merging limitations. It's v8 and cover
letter still does not state it. Neither the patches do.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists