[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGJbXg88JOu4aiNe@orome>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 18:18:38 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>, treding@...dia.com,
dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
rafael@...nel.org, jonathanh@...dia.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, helgaas@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, mmaddireddy@...dia.com, kw@...ux.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, vidyas@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com,
ksitaraman@...dia.com, ishah@...dia.com, bbasu@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v8 0/8] Tegra234 Memory interconnect support
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:41:45PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/05/2023 19:32, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Have incorporated the suggestions in v7. Only changed 'patch 1' in v7
> > to fix possible race when setting 'mc->bpmp' as pointed by Krzysztof.
> > Requesting to merge the patch series.
> >
>
> Can I apply it since you request it? I asked you long time ago to
> clearly state dependencies or merging limitations. It's v8 and cover
> letter still does not state it. Neither the patches do.
I thought we had discussed and agreed to merge this through the Tegra
tree, which is why you had provided Acked-bys on all the patches. I was
waiting for a final Acked-by on patch 1, since that was the only one
still being revised.
If you prefer to merge this, that works for me too. In that case, the
series:
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Although it might be good if I pick up at least patch 8, just as a
precautionary measure to avoid potential conflicts going forward. As I
understand, it should be safe to apply that separately.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists