lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 13:58:35 -0700
From:   Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
To:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
CC:     Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <robdclark@...il.com>,
        <sean@...rly.run>, <swboyd@...omium.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
        <vkoul@...nel.org>, <daniel@...ll.ch>, <airlied@...il.com>,
        <agross@...nel.org>, <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>, <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] drm/msm/dpu: add dsc blocks for remaining chipsets
 in catalog



On 5/15/2023 1:07 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> On 2023-05-15 11:20:02, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/14/2023 2:39 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>> DSC*, and mention 1.1 explicitly (since this skips the 1.2 blocks, while
>>> the series is clearly aimed at 1.1...).  This was done for the DSC 1.2
>>> HW block patch after all.
>>>
>>> in catalog -> to catalog
>>>
>>> But it's just two platforms, you can fit MSM8998 and SC8180X in the
>>> title.
>>>
>>> On 2023-05-12 11:00:16, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
>>>>
>>>> There are some platforms has DSC blocks but it is not declared at catalog.
>>>
>>> Some platforms have DSC blocks which have not yet been declared in the
>>> catalog.*
>>>
>>>> For completeness, this patch adds DSC blocks for platforms which missed
>>>> them.
>>>
>>> Drop "this patch":
>>>
>>>       Complete DSC 1.1 support for all platforms by adding the missing
>>>       blocks to MSM8998 and SC8180X.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h |  7 +++++++
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h | 11 +++++++++++
>>>
>>> How about SC7180, and any other DPU 6.x revision?
>>>
>>
>> Will let kuogee respond to the other nits. There is no DSC in sc7180 /
>> sm6115 / qcm2290. So this patch is complete.
> 
> Thank you for checking as I didn't have the DTS close (and it seems
> SC7180 would have supported this, but no).  I did check other SoCs in
> the DPU 6.x range that are currently floating in my tree and on the
> list, which do need their DSC 1.1 block added (both a single block at
> 0x81000 downstream, 0x80000 upstream), if you can in a resend Konrad:
> 
> DPU 6.4 in SM6350: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230411-topic-straitlagoon_mdss-v3-6-9837d6b3516d@linaro.org/
> DPU 6.9 in SM6375: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230411-topic-straitlagoon_mdss-v3-8-9837d6b3516d@linaro.org/
> 

If these are still on the list, can Konrad add them to his change as 
that way his catalog change will be complete? Otherwise I would prefer 
to add them in a follow up change because marking this change as 
dependent on a catalog change which adds a new chipset is not right.

> Thanks!
> 
> - Marijn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ