[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230515063848.77947-1-jiahao.os@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 14:38:44 +0800
From: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@...edance.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hao Jia <jiahao.os@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/4] Fix some warnings about rq clock
These four patches fix some warnings about rq clock.
Patch1 fixes the warning of using the old rq clock caused by
missing update rq clock.
Patch2-4 fixes the warning that the rq clock was updated multiple
times while holding the rq lock.
v2->v3:
- Modify the commit information of patch1 to make the description clearer.
- Split v2 patch2 into 3 separate patches.
v1->v2:
- Vincent Guittot suggested using rq_clock_start_loop_update()
to prevent multiple calls to update_rq_clock() in unthrottle_cfs_rq()
instead of removing update_rq_clock() from unthrottle_cfs_rq()
and updating the rq clock before unthrottle_cfs_rq() for patch2.
[v2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230510083450.62334-1-jiahao.os@bytedance.com
[v1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230410081206.23441-1-jiahao.os@bytedance.com
Hao Jia (4):
sched/core: Fixed missing rq clock update before calling
set_rq_offline()
sched/core: Avoid double calling update_rq_clock() in
__balance_push_cpu_stop()
sched/core: Avoid multiple calling update_rq_clock() in
__cfsb_csd_unthrottle()
sched/core: Avoid multiple calling update_rq_clock() in
unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs()
kernel/sched/core.c | 7 ++++---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/sched.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/topology.c | 10 ++++++----
4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.37.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists