lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGGKwA10shGGUr87@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 10:28:32 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
Cc:     corbet@....net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, perex@...ex.cz,
        tiwai@...e.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, himadrispandya@...il.com,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] selftests: ALSA: Add test for the 'valsa' driver

On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:20:37AM +0400, Ivan Orlov wrote:

> +uid=$(id -u)
> +if [ $uid -ne 0 ]; then
> +	echo "$0: Must be run as root"
> +	exit 1
> +fi

It is not an error to run the selftest as a non-root user, the test
should be skipped.

> +modprobe snd-valsa

We don't check if the module was already loaded.

> +if [ ! -e /sys/kernel/debug/valsa/pc_test ]; then
> +	mount -t debugfs none /sys/kernel/debug
> +
> +	if [ ! -e /sys/kernel/debug/valsa/pc_test ]; then
> +		echo "$0: Error mounting debugfs"
> +		exit 4
> +	fi
> +fi

This will unconditionally attempt to mount debugfs in a standard
location and won't clean up after itself, if the system didn't have
debugfs mounted for some reason then this will leave it sitting there.

> +success="1"
> +arecord -D hw:CARD=valsa,DEV=0 -c 1 --buffer-size=8192 -f S16_LE -r 8000 --duration=4 out.wav
> +
> +if [[ $(< /sys/kernel/debug/valsa/ioctl_test) == "$success" ]]; then
> +	echo "$0: ioctl test: success"
> +else
> +	echo "$0: ioctl test: fail"
> +fi

Would it not be better to have a C program that actually calls the ioctl
rather than a custom debugfs thing that may or may not be wired up to do
the same thing as an ioctl would?  It seems like other than whatever
this ioctl test actually does this is all just a simplified version of
the existing pcm-test.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ