linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] clk: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 14 May 2023 19:06:11 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: qcom: restrict drivers per ARM/ARM64

On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 01:47:11PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> There is no point to allow selecting clock controller drivers for
> Qualcomm ARMv7 SoCs when building ARM64 kernel, and vice versa.  This
> makes kernel configuration more difficult as many do not remember the
> Qualcomm SoCs model names/numbers.  No features should be lost because:
> 1. There won't be a single image for ARMv7 and ARMv8/9 SoCs.
> 2. Newer ARMv8/9 SoCs won't be running in arm32 emulation mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> 

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>

Regards,
Bjorn