[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230515094955.GB23880@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 11:49:55 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Cc: corbet@....net, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
paulmck@...nel.org, bp@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, kim.phillips@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, thunder.leizhen@...wei.com, ardb@...nel.org,
bhe@...hat.com, anshuman.khandual@....com,
song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all
architectures
This looks fine to me. Can you please work with Barry to make sure
the slight different place of the initcall doesn't break anything
for his setup? I doubt it would, but I'd rather have a Tested-by:
tag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists