[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230515095752.GQ68926@ediswmail.ad.cirrus.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 09:57:52 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, <lee@...nel.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
<sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>, <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] irqchip/cs42l43: Add support for the cs42l43 IRQs
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:08:41AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 04:42:33PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> > I guess if Mark doesn't mind I think the only internal bit of the
> > device that uses the IRQs is the CODEC driver so I could move the
> > IRQ handling in there, it does seem a little odd to me, but I
> > guess I don't have any problems with it.
>
> The obvious (and previously standard) place for it would be the MFD.
Alright I certainly have no objection to moving it there, although
would be good to get Lee's thoughts, make sure he is happy with
that too.
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists