linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ASoC: starfive: Add JH7110 TDM driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZGIOmWyxPGOuWHx+@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 19:51:05 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Walker Chen <walker.chen@...rfivetech.com>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ASoC: starfive: Add JH7110 TDM driver

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 04:29:07PM +0800, Walker Chen wrote:

> I have submitted new version of patch for TDM driver. Could you please help to review and give your comments? 

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)