linux-kernel - Re: [patch V4 37/37] x86/smpboot/64: Implement arch_cpuhp_init_parallel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230515120051.GH83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 14:00:51 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Arjan van de Veen <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
        Piotr Gorski <lucjan.lucjanov@...il.com>,
        Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Sabin Rapan <sabrapan@...zon.com>,
        "Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 37/37] x86/smpboot/64: Implement
 arch_cpuhp_init_parallel_bringup() and enable it

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:07:56PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> Implement the validation function which tells the core code whether
> parallel bringup is possible.
> 
> The only condition for now is that the kernel does not run in an encrypted
> guest as these will trap the RDMSR via #VC, which cannot be handled at that
> point in early startup.
> 
> There was an earlier variant for AMD-SEV which used the GHBC protocol for
> retrieving the APIC ID via CPUID, but there is no guarantee that the
> initial APIC ID in CPUID is the same as the real APIC ID. There is no
> enforcement from the secure firmware and the hypervisor can assign APIC IDs
> as it sees fit as long as the ACPI/MADT table is consistent with that
> assignment.
> 
> Unfortunately there is no RDMSR GHCB protocol at the moment, so enabling
> AMD-SEV guests for parallel startup needs some more thought.

One option, other than adding said protocol, would be to:

 - use the APICID from CPUID -- with the expectation that it can be
   wrong.
 - (ab)use one of the high bits in cpuid_to_apicid[] as a test-and-set
   trylock. This avoids two CPUs from using the same per-cpu base, if
   CPUID is being malicious. Panic on fail.
 - validate against MSR the moment we can and panic if not matching

The trylock ensures the stacks/percpu state is not used by multiple
CPUs, and should guarantee a coherent state to get far enough along to
be able to do the #VE inducing RDMSR.