[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7faf4c16-98ff-f27d-d1fd-3058370c06f5@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 14:28:00 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add video clock controller
On 9.05.2023 18:12, Jagadeesh Kona wrote:
> Add device node for video clock controller on Qualcomm SM8550 platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
> index 6e9bad8f6f33..e67e7c69dae6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8550.dtsi
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-gcc.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-tcsr.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-dispcc.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-videocc.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/dma/qcom-gpi.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> @@ -759,6 +760,17 @@ gcc: clock-controller@...000 {
> <&usb_dp_qmpphy QMP_USB43DP_USB3_PIPE_CLK>;
> };
>
> + videocc: clock-controller@...0000 {
This node should be moved down. Nodes with unit addresses
should be sorted alphanumerically.
> + compatible = "qcom,sm8550-videocc";
> + reg = <0 0x0aaf0000 0 0x10000>;
> + clocks = <&bi_tcxo_div2>, <&gcc GCC_VIDEO_AHB_CLK>;
One per line, please
Also, any reason the XO clock does not come from RPMhCC?
Konrad
> + power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8550_MMCX>;
> + required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +
> ipcc: mailbox@...000 {
> compatible = "qcom,sm8550-ipcc", "qcom,ipcc";
> reg = <0 0x00408000 0 0x1000>;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists