[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGIoTmQFO5SlmUIx@li-008a6a4c-3549-11b2-a85c-c5cc2836eea2.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 14:40:46 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] statfs: Enforce statfs[64] structure intialization
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 04:40:19PM +0200, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> This series fixes copying of uninitialized memory to userspace by
> do_statfs_native() and do_statfs64() on s390.
>
> Patch 1 fixes the problem by making the code similar to
> put_compat_statfs() and put_compat_statfs64().
>
> Patch 2 gets rid of the padding which caused the issue; even though it
> may be considered redundant, it documents that s390 de-facto has an
> extra f_spare array element.
>
> Ilya Leoshkevich (2):
> statfs: Enforce statfs[64] structure intialization
> s390/uapi: Cover statfs padding by growing f_spare
>
> arch/s390/include/asm/compat.h | 2 +-
> arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/statfs.h | 4 ++--
> fs/statfs.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Series applied,
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists