linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_pci: remove unreachable code for ASIX devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <188db6e4-d1de-6643-f6e1-5cb3807b28ee@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 10:36:30 +0800
From:   Jiaqing Zhao <jiaqing.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_pci: remove unreachable code for ASIX
 devices



On 2023-05-13 18:28, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 02:28:56PM +0000, Jiaqing Zhao wrote:
>> PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASIX (0x9710) is the same as PCI_VENDOR_ID_NETMOS. In
>> pci_serial_quirks array, the NetMos entry always takes precedence over
>> the ASIX entry. So the code for ASIX devices is always unreachable,
>> even when it was initially merged. Since the NetMos vendor driver
>> doesn't mention such FIFO bug, it's safe to remove the code.
>>
>> This reverts commit eb26dfe8aa7e ("8250: add support for ASIX devices
>> with a FIFO bug").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiaqing Zhao <jiaqing.zhao@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Please follow the documented Intel kernel developer requirements before
> you submit this again, based on the changes that process will require.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Sorry I am unable to find this "Intel kernel developer requirements". Is
there any link or contact where I can find this information? Thank you.