linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/20] x86: decompressor: Avoid the need for a stack in the 32-bit trampoline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 17:03:03 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Evgeniy Baskov <baskov@...ras.ru>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/20] x86: decompressor: Avoid the need for a stack
 in the 32-bit trampoline

On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:03:15AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The 32-bit trampoline no longer uses the stack for anything except
> performing a long return back to long mode. Currently, this stack is
> allocated in the same page that carries the trampoline code, which means
> this page must be mapped writable and executable, and the stack is
> therefore executable as well.
> 
> So let's do a long jump instead: that way, we can pre-calculate the
> return address and poke it into the code before we call it. In a later
> patch, we will take advantage of this by removing writable permissions
> (and adding executable ones) explicitly when booting via the EFI stub.
> 
> Not playing with the stack pointer also makes it more straight-forward
> to call the trampoline code as an ordinary 64-bit function from C code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov