linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 36/43] pwm: ep93xx: drop legacy pinctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230515143222.dlhxcze5254773r4@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 16:32:22 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/43] pwm: ep93xx: drop legacy pinctrl

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 03:34:52PM +0300, Nikita Shubin wrote:
> Drop legacy gpio request/free since we are using
> pinctrl for this now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@...uefel.me>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c | 16 ----------------
>  1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c
> index 8bfe6cfbb3db..657adb011aeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-ep93xx.c
> @@ -45,20 +45,6 @@ static inline struct ep93xx_pwm *to_ep93xx_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
>  	return container_of(chip, struct ep93xx_pwm, chip);
>  }
>  
> -static int ep93xx_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> -{
> -	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(chip->dev);
> -
> -	return ep93xx_pwm_acquire_gpio(pdev);

I didn't get the whole series and didn't spot a relevant followup change
on lore.k.o, so: I assume ep93xx_pwm_acquire_gpio() and
ep93xx_pwm_release_gpio() will be unused in the end? Do you drop them?

I assume this series target to be taken via arm-soc (once the review
feedback is positive)?

I wonder if this change breaks non-dt machine support?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)