linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] leds: simatic-ipc-leds-gpio: split up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230515170654.7aaae69c@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net>
Date:   Mon, 15 May 2023 17:06:54 +0200
From:   Henning Schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] leds: simatic-ipc-leds-gpio: split up

Am Mon, 15 May 2023 13:12:47 +0100
schrieb Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>:

> On Mon, 15 May 2023, Henning Schild wrote:
> 
> > Am Mon, 15 May 2023 10:50:42 +0100
> > schrieb Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>:
> >   
> > > On Sat, 13 May 2023, Henning Schild wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Ping.
> > > > 
> > > > As far as i remember this one should be ready to merge.
> > > > 
> > > > ACKed by Hans, and Andy had no objections given the maintainers
> > > > would accept the patches.
> > > > 
> > > > So i think it is the maintainers turn now, Pavel and/or Lee i
> > > > guess.    
> > > 
> > > Looks like there are lots of mail threads in reply to each of the
> > > patches.  If these culminated in acceptance, please collect all
> > > of the Acks you've received until this point and submit a
> > > [RESEND].  If there are changes to be made still, please do the
> > > same but submit as a new version.  
> > 
> > Ok i will send it again and include the ACK from Hans. There would
> > be no code change. Please review the code already, if you find it
> > acceptable we might receive a second ACK from Andy.  
> 
> Not sure what you mean by 'already'.
> 
> I shall not be reviewing this set until it is resent, thanks.

I just sent that v3 you requested. It has one Ack from Hans in p3. And
some minor style things from Andy, which i decided to take in when
having to rebase and test once more.

Looking forward to your feedback on that v3.

regards,
Henning