[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8e61f82-bb1d-4778-3624-157890b1b8dd@lwfinger.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 12:53:03 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: b43: fix incorrect __packed annotation
On 5/16/23 02:45, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> clang warns about an unpacked structure inside of a packed one:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h:654:4: error: field data within 'struct b43_iv' is less aligned than 'union (unnamed union at /home/arnd/arm-soc/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h:651:2)' and is usually due to 'struct b43_iv' being packed, which can lead to unaligned accesses [-Werror,-Wunaligned-access]
>
> The problem here is that the anonymous union has the default alignment
> from its members, apparently because the original author mixed up the
> placement of the __packed attribute by placing it next to the struct
> member rather than the union definition. As the struct itself is
> also marked as __packed, there is no need to mark its members, so just
> move the annotation to the inner type instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h
> index 9fc7c088a539..67b4bac048e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/b43.h
> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ struct b43_iv {
> union {
> __be16 d16;
> __be32 d32;
> - } data __packed;
> + } __packed data > } __packed;
This change works on a BCM4306 and BCM4318=.
Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To answer Michael's question, b43legacy has the same issue.
Larry
Larry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists