[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e31ec9bc-7b18-8711-2b63-b3fb4177abcb@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 13:24:33 -0600
From: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
CC: Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/qaic: silence some uninitialized variable warnings
On 5/10/2023 10:48 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 08:57:03AM -0600, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> On 5/3/2023 4:41 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> Smatch complains that these are not initialized if get_cntl_version()
>>> fails but we still print them in the debug message. Not the end of
>>> the world, but true enough. Let's just initialize them to a dummy value
>>> to make the checker happy.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
>>
>> Thanks for the cleanup.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
>>
>> Could use a fixes tag
>
> The fixes tag thing could have gone either way. It's really minor.
>
>> and also I'd prefer to maintain the style of sorting
>> the variable declaration lines by line length. Given the minor nature of
>> these nits, I plan to address them.
>
> Thanks!
Pushed to drm-misc-fixes
-Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists