linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/4] atm: hide unused procfs functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230516194625.549249-2-arnd@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 16 May 2023 21:45:34 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] atm: hide unused procfs functions

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

When CONFIG_PROC_FS is disabled, the function declarations for some
procfs functions are hidden, but the definitions are still build,
as shown by this compiler warning:

net/atm/resources.c:403:7: error: no previous prototype for 'atm_dev_seq_start' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
net/atm/resources.c:409:6: error: no previous prototype for 'atm_dev_seq_stop' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
net/atm/resources.c:414:7: error: no previous prototype for 'atm_dev_seq_next' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]

Add another #ifdef to leave these out of the build.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
 net/atm/resources.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/atm/resources.c b/net/atm/resources.c
index 2b2d33eeaf20..995d29e7fb13 100644
--- a/net/atm/resources.c
+++ b/net/atm/resources.c
@@ -400,6 +400,7 @@ int atm_dev_ioctl(unsigned int cmd, void __user *buf, int __user *sioc_len,
 	return error;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 void *atm_dev_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
 {
 	mutex_lock(&atm_dev_mutex);
@@ -415,3 +416,4 @@ void *atm_dev_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 {
 	return seq_list_next(v, &atm_devs, pos);
 }
+#endif
-- 
2.39.2