[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7550521-65bf-f9af-ddb0-118602a6340c@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 13:03:32 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@...e.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
marcelo.cerri@...onical.com, tim.gardner@...onical.com,
khalid.elmously@...onical.com, philip.cox@...onical.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 6/9] efi/unaccepted: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad()
stepping into unaccepted memory
On 5/16/23 11:35, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> Does this mean that the kernel maps memory before accepting it? As
>>> otherwise, I would assume that such an access would page fault inside
>>> the guest before triggering an exception related to the unaccepted
>>> state.
>> Yes, the kernel maps memory before accepting it (modulo things like
>> DEBUG_PAGEALLOC).
>>
> OK, and so the architecture stipulates that prefetching or other
> speculative accesses must never deliver exceptions to the host
> regarding such ranges?
I don't know of anywhere that this is explicitly written. It's probably
implicit _somewhere_ in the reams of VMX/TDX and base SDM docs, but heck
if I know where it is. :)
If this is something anyone wants to see added to the SEPT_VE_DISABLE
documentation, please speak up. I don't think it would be hard to get
it added and provide an explicit guarantee.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists