[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230516235844.9303-1-beaub@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 16:58:44 -0700
From: Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tracing/user_events: Use non-RCU context for enabler writes
Currently when events are enabled/disabled a top level mm enumeration is
done in a non-RCU context, however, the enablers are still in a
RCU-context. Each enabler is updated via user_event_enabler_write() which
uses pin_user_pages_remote(). This function can reschedule and should not
be used from a RCU-context.
Use the same approach as the top level mm enumeration, which builds a
temporary list of target enablers within a RCU-context then exits. Then
use list from a non-RCU context when calling user_event_enabler_write().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230515165707.hv65ekwp2djkjj5i@MacBook-Pro-8.local/
Fixes: 7235759084a4 ("tracing/user_events: Use remote writes for event enablement")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Beau Belgrave <beaub@...ux.microsoft.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
index b1ecd7677642..00d956e7e35a 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c
@@ -96,12 +96,15 @@ struct user_event {
* these to track enablement sites that are tied to an event.
*/
struct user_event_enabler {
- struct list_head link;
- struct user_event *event;
- unsigned long addr;
+ struct list_head link;
+ struct user_event *event;
+ unsigned long addr;
+
+ /* Used to build a list within RCU context for a non-RCU context. */
+ struct user_event_enabler *next;
/* Track enable bit, flags, etc. Aligned for bitops. */
- unsigned int values;
+ unsigned int values;
};
/* Bits 0-5 are for the bit to update upon enable/disable (0-63 allowed) */
@@ -165,6 +168,8 @@ static int user_event_parse(struct user_event_group *group, char *name,
char *args, char *flags,
struct user_event **newuser);
+static struct user_event_enabler
+*user_event_enabler_get_all(struct user_event_mm *mm, struct user_event *user);
static struct user_event_mm *user_event_mm_get(struct user_event_mm *mm);
static struct user_event_mm *user_event_mm_get_all(struct user_event *user);
static void user_event_mm_put(struct user_event_mm *mm);
@@ -450,25 +455,28 @@ static bool user_event_enabler_exists(struct user_event_mm *mm,
static void user_event_enabler_update(struct user_event *user)
{
- struct user_event_enabler *enabler;
struct user_event_mm *mm = user_event_mm_get_all(user);
+ struct user_event_enabler *enabler;
struct user_event_mm *next;
int attempt;
while (mm) {
next = mm->next;
+ enabler = user_event_enabler_get_all(mm, user);
+
+ if (unlikely(!enabler))
+ goto next_mm;
+
mmap_read_lock(mm->mm);
- rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(enabler, &mm->enablers, link) {
- if (enabler->event == user) {
- attempt = 0;
- user_event_enabler_write(mm, enabler, true, &attempt);
- }
+ while (enabler) {
+ attempt = 0;
+ user_event_enabler_write(mm, enabler, true, &attempt);
+ enabler = enabler->next;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
mmap_read_unlock(mm->mm);
+next_mm:
user_event_mm_put(mm);
mm = next;
}
@@ -500,6 +508,35 @@ static bool user_event_enabler_dup(struct user_event_enabler *orig,
return true;
}
+static struct user_event_enabler
+*user_event_enabler_get_all(struct user_event_mm *mm, struct user_event *user)
+{
+ struct user_event_enabler *found = NULL;
+ struct user_event_enabler *enabler;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&event_mutex);
+
+ /*
+ * We need to get enablers from within a RCU context to a non-RCU
+ * context quickly. We build a single linked list under the RCU
+ * to enable this. Typically this is required for doing actions
+ * on enablers that might sleep or schedule.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(enabler, &mm->enablers, link) {
+ if (enabler->event == user) {
+ enabler->next = found;
+ found = enabler;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return found;
+}
+
static struct user_event_mm *user_event_mm_get(struct user_event_mm *mm)
{
refcount_inc(&mm->refcnt);
@@ -513,6 +550,8 @@ static struct user_event_mm *user_event_mm_get_all(struct user_event *user)
struct user_event_enabler *enabler;
struct user_event_mm *mm;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&event_mutex);
+
/*
* We do not want to block fork/exec while enablements are being
* updated, so we use RCU to walk the current tasks that have used
@@ -525,13 +564,15 @@ static struct user_event_mm *user_event_mm_get_all(struct user_event *user)
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(mm, &user_event_mms, link)
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(enabler, &mm->enablers, link)
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(mm, &user_event_mms, link) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(enabler, &mm->enablers, link) {
if (enabler->event == user) {
mm->next = found;
found = user_event_mm_get(mm);
break;
}
+ }
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
base-commit: 3862f86c1529fa0016de6344eb974877b4cd3838
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists