[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230516071830.8190-4-zegao@tencent.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 15:18:29 +0800
From: Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] fprobe: add recursion detection in fprobe_exit_handler
fprobe_hander and fprobe_kprobe_handler has guarded ftrace recursion
detection but fprobe_exit_handler has not, which possibly introduce
recursive calls if the fprobe exit callback calls any traceable
functions. Checking in fprobe_hander or fprobe_kprobe_handler
is not enough and misses this case.
So add recursion free guard the same way as fprobe_hander. Since
ftrace recursion check does not employ ip(s), so here use entry_ip and
entry_parent_ip the same as fprobe_handler.
Fixes: 5b0ab78998e3 ("fprobe: Add exit_handler support")
Signed-off-by: Ze Gao <zegao@...cent.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
---
kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
index 097c740799ba..a9580a88cc15 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
struct fprobe_rethook_node {
struct rethook_node node;
unsigned long entry_ip;
+ unsigned long entry_parent_ip;
char data[];
};
@@ -39,6 +40,7 @@ static inline void __fprobe_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long
}
fpr = container_of(rh, struct fprobe_rethook_node, node);
fpr->entry_ip = ip;
+ fpr->entry_parent_ip = parent_ip;
if (fp->entry_data_size)
entry_data = fpr->data;
}
@@ -114,14 +116,25 @@ static void fprobe_exit_handler(struct rethook_node *rh, void *data,
{
struct fprobe *fp = (struct fprobe *)data;
struct fprobe_rethook_node *fpr;
+ int bit;
if (!fp || fprobe_disabled(fp))
return;
fpr = container_of(rh, struct fprobe_rethook_node, node);
+ /* we need to assure no calls to traceable functions in-between the
+ * end of fprobe_handler and the beginning of fprobe_exit_handler.
+ */
+ bit = ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(fpr->entry_ip, fpr->entry_parent_ip);
+ if (bit < 0) {
+ fp->nmissed++;
+ return;
+ }
+
fp->exit_handler(fp, fpr->entry_ip, regs,
fp->entry_data_size ? (void *)fpr->data : NULL);
+ ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(bit);
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(fprobe_exit_handler);
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists