linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: Disable EL2 traps for BRBE instructions executed in EL1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bkikwxpd.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 16 May 2023 08:18:54 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: Disable EL2 traps for BRBE instructions executed in EL1

On Tue, 16 May 2023 03:43:27 +0100,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/15/23 19:12, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 May 2023 11:53:28 +0100,
> > Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com> wrote:
> >>

[...]

> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> >> index 037724b19c5c..06bf321a17be 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> >> @@ -161,6 +161,16 @@
> >>  	msr_s	SYS_HFGWTR_EL2, x0
> >>  	msr_s	SYS_HFGITR_EL2, xzr
> >>  
> >> +	mrs	x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> >> +	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT, #4
> >> +	cbz	x1, .Lskip_brbe_\@
> >> +
> >> +	mov	x0, xzr
> >> +	orr	x0, x0, #HFGITR_EL2_nBRBIALL
> >> +	orr	x0, x0, #HFGITR_EL2_nBRBINJ
> >> +	msr_s	SYS_HFGITR_EL2, x0
> > 
> > This will break badly if someone inserts something between this hunk
> > and the initial setting of HFGITR_EL2. I'd really prefer a RMW
> > approach.  It's not that this code has to be optimised anyway.
> 
> Something like this instead ? So that even if there are more changes
> before this hunk, it will be fetched correctly with first mrs_s and
> only additional bits related to BRBE will be set there after.
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> index 037724b19c5c..bfaf41ad9c4e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
> @@ -161,6 +161,16 @@
>         msr_s   SYS_HFGWTR_EL2, x0
>         msr_s   SYS_HFGITR_EL2, xzr
>  
> +       mrs     x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
> +       ubfx    x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_SHIFT, #4
> +       cbz     x1, .Lskip_brbe_\@
> +
> +       mrs_s   x0, SYS_HFGITR_EL2
> +       orr     x0, x0, #HFGITR_EL2_nBRBIALL
> +       orr     x0, x0, #HFGITR_EL2_nBRBINJ
> +       msr_s   SYS_HFGITR_EL2, x0
> +
> +.Lskip_brbe_\@:
>         mrs     x1, id_aa64pfr0_el1             // AMU traps UNDEF without AMU
>         ubfx    x1, x1, #ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_AMU_SHIFT, #4
>         cbz     x1, .Lskip_fgt_\@

Yes, this is much better.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.