[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <168422819895.404.9292905514858665876.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 09:09:58 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: smp/core] x86/xen/hvm: Get rid of DEAD_FROZEN handling
The following commit has been merged into the smp/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: ab24eb9abb9c60c45119370731735b79ed79f36c
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/ab24eb9abb9c60c45119370731735b79ed79f36c
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Fri, 12 May 2023 23:07:25 +02:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 15 May 2023 13:44:55 +02:00
x86/xen/hvm: Get rid of DEAD_FROZEN handling
No point in this conditional voodoo. Un-initializing the lock mechanism is
safe to be called unconditionally even if it was already invoked when the
CPU died.
Remove the invocation of xen_smp_intr_free() as that has been already
cleaned up in xen_cpu_dead_hvm().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Tested-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de> # parisc
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com> # Steam Deck
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230512205256.423407127@linutronix.de
---
arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
index c1cd28e..a6820ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten_hvm.c
@@ -161,13 +161,12 @@ static int xen_cpu_up_prepare_hvm(unsigned int cpu)
int rc = 0;
/*
- * This can happen if CPU was offlined earlier and
- * offlining timed out in common_cpu_die().
+ * If a CPU was offlined earlier and offlining timed out then the
+ * lock mechanism is still initialized. Uninit it unconditionally
+ * as it's safe to call even if already uninited. Interrupts and
+ * timer have already been handled in xen_cpu_dead_hvm().
*/
- if (cpu_report_state(cpu) == CPU_DEAD_FROZEN) {
- xen_smp_intr_free(cpu);
- xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu);
- }
+ xen_uninit_lock_cpu(cpu);
if (cpu_acpi_id(cpu) != U32_MAX)
per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu_acpi_id(cpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists