linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 19/21] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZGNL427cvjGQ-7dY@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 16 May 2023 11:24:51 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/21] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model

Le Mon, May 15, 2023 at 02:41:33PM +0200, Sebastian Siewior a écrit :
> On 2023-05-15 12:50:25 [+0200], Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> > As menitoned in the reply last week to Frederics objections regarding the
> > locking asymmetry, I would like to keep it to make the locking region of
> > timer base locks as small as possible and to prevent holding up to five
> > locks during the walk.
> 
> This looks okay. I wouldn't suggest to hold the timer_base::lock or
> tmigr_cpu::lock longer than needed. Both can be acquired independently
> cross CPU and have explicit locking order. So it is fine.


   LOCK(A)
   LOCK(B)
   UNLOCK(A)
   UNLOCK(B)


Cross rhymes aren't pretty in locking. They don't make the review smooth
but yeah it's not incorrect either. And since I don't have a better way to
propose...

> 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 	Anna-Maria
> 
> Sebastian