[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <IA1PR20MB49539F3FBE068C7C811152B1BB799@IA1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 17:45:03 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Nikita Shubin <n.shubin@...ro.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...look.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf vendor events riscv: add T-HEAD C9xx JSON file
> Do c906 and c910 have same HPM events ?
>
> https://github.com/T-head-Semi/openc906/blob/main/C906_RTL_FACTORY/gen_rtl/pmu/rtl/aq_hpcp_top.v
>
> and
>
>
> https://github.com/T-head-Semi/openc910/blob/main/C910_RTL_FACTORY/gen_rtl/pmu/rtl/ct_hpcp_top.v
>
> Look different to me - am i missing something ?
Yes, they as different, but event ids are compatible. See [1] p.99 and [2] p.73.
It seems I forgot extra event index from C906. I will fix in the v2.
[1] https://github.com/T-head-Semi/openc910/blob/main/doc/%E7%8E%84%E9%93%81C910%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8C.pdf
[2] https://github.com/T-head-Semi/openc906/blob/main/doc/%E7%8E%84%E9%93%81C906%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8C.pdf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists