[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230516100758.GE10825@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 11:07:58 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] irqchip/cs42l43: Add support for the cs42l43 IRQs
On Mon, 15 May 2023, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:08:41AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 04:42:33PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
> >
> > > I guess if Mark doesn't mind I think the only internal bit of the
> > > device that uses the IRQs is the CODEC driver so I could move the
> > > IRQ handling in there, it does seem a little odd to me, but I
> > > guess I don't have any problems with it.
> >
> > The obvious (and previously standard) place for it would be the MFD.
>
> Alright I certainly have no objection to moving it there, although
> would be good to get Lee's thoughts, make sure he is happy with
> that too.
Submit a patch and we'll take it from there.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists