linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] rust: str: add conversion from `CStr` to `CString`

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 May 2023 11:12:02 +0000
From:   Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To:     nmi@...aspace.dk
Cc:     alex.gaynor@...il.com, alice@...l.io, benno.lossin@...ton.me,
        bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ojeda@...nel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
        wedsonaf@...il.com, yakoyoku@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: str: add conversion from `CStr` to `CString`

Andreas Hindborg <nmi@...aspace.dk> writes:
> Alice Ryhl <alice@...l.io> writes:
>> On 5/8/23 13:41, Gary Guo wrote:
>>> On Wed,  3 May 2023 14:10:16 +0000
>>> Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>> These methods can be used to copy the data in a temporary c string into
>>>> a separate allocation, so that it can be accessed later even if the
>>>> original is deallocated.
>>>>
>>>> The API in this change mirrors the standard library API for the `&str`
>>>> and `String` types. The `ToOwned` trait is not implemented because it
>>>> assumes that allocations are infallible.
>>> How about add a `TryToOwned` trait to the kernel crate and implement
>>> that trait for `CStr` instead?
>>
>> Eh, I don't think it's worth it. It doesn't give anything new to the CStr api,
>> and I think it's rather unlikely that someone will actually need to be generic
>> over such a trait any time soon.
> 
> It is just as valid as having `From<&str>` and `ToOwned<&str>`. While it
> does not add anything in terms of function, it carries intention. I
> think we should consider adding it at some point.
> 
> BR Andreas

Sure, I think its quite reasonable to add new traits, I just don't think
it should be part of this patch. Adding new traits makes it a
significantly bigger change IMO, and my changes have an actual user down
the road.

Alice