[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a370f2af-a894-b102-1836-8964c39d7a86@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 13:54:21 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@...vell.com>,
"wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/2 v7] dt-bindings: watchdog: marvell GTI
system watchdog driver
On 16/05/2023 13:24, Sunil Kovvuri Goutham wrote:
>
> Also this is the same naming we have been using in other drivers as well.
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cn10k.c
>
> drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.c
> static const struct of_device_id cn10k_ddr_pmu_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "marvell,cn10k-ddr-pmu", },
> { },
BTW, I don't understand this part. We do not talk about fallback
compatible, so what does it prove? Of course driver will look like that,
but we established it some time ago, didn't we?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists