linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: x86: Advertise CPUID.7.2.EDX and RRSBA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 May 2023 10:22:22 +0800
From:   Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
To:     Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jiaan Lu <jiaan.lu@...el.com>,
        Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@...el.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: x86: Advertise CPUID.7.2.EDX and
 RRSBA_CTRL support

On 5/16/2023 10:04 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 02:53:07PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> On 4/14/2023 2:25 PM, Chao Gao wrote:
>>> From: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@...el.com>
>>>
>>> Add a kvm-only CPUID feature leaf for CPUID.7.2.EDX and RRSBA_CTRL
>>> as the first feature in the leaf.
>>>
>>> RRSBA_CTRL is enumerated by CPUID.7.2.EDX[2]. If supported, RRSBA_DIS_U
>>> (bit 5) and RRSBA_DIS_S (bit 6) of IA32_SPEC_CTRL MSR can be used to
>>> disable RRSBA behavior for CPL3 and CPL0/1/2 respectively.
>>>
>>> Note that KVM does not intercept guests' IA32_SPEC_CTRL MSR accesses
>>> after a non-zero is written to the MSR. Therefore, guests can already
>>> toggle the two bits if the host supports RRSBA_CTRL, and no extra code
>>> is needed to allow guests to toggle the two bits.
>>
>> This is a bug that also matters with other bits in MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL which
>> has a dedicated enumeration CPUID bit and no support in KVM yet.
> 
> Do you mean passing through the MSR is a bug? guest can write any hardware
> supported value to the MSR if the MSR isn't intercepted.
> 
> I guess this is intentional and a trade-off for performance (note that
> context-switch may cause writes to the MSR). And see
> 
> commit 841c2be09fe4 ("kvm: x86: replace kvm_spec_ctrl_test_value with runtime test on the host")
> 
> it appears that this behavior is widely recognized.
> 
>>
>> I think we need to fix this bug at first.
> 
> I have no idea how to fix the "bug" without intercepting the MSR. The
> performance penalty makes me think intercepting the MSR is not a viable
> solution.

I thought correctness always takes higher priority over performance.

>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@...el.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
>>> Tested-by: Jiaan Lu <jiaan.lu@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c         | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>>>    arch/x86/kvm/reverse_cpuid.h |  7 +++++++
>>>    2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>>> index 9583a110cf5f..f024c3ac2203 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
>>> @@ -685,6 +685,10 @@ void kvm_set_cpu_caps(void)
>>>    		SF(SGX1) | SF(SGX2) | SF(SGX_EDECCSSA)
>>>    	);
>>> +	kvm_cpu_cap_init_kvm_defined(CPUID_7_2_EDX,
>>> +		SF(RRSBA_CTRL)
>>> +	);
>>> +
>>
>> Please move this hook up to right follow the leaf CPUID_7_1_EAX.
> 
> sure. will do.