[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a22a3fe6-7bb1-9b47-9a14-41d957f178f3@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 19:54:00 +0530
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"Andy Gross" <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
"Konrad Dybcio" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com>,
<quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>, <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
<quic_jackp@...cinc.com>, <quic_harshq@...cinc.com>,
<ahalaney@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8280xp: Add multiport
controller node for SC8280
On 5/16/2023 4:24 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:02:13PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
>> On 5/15/2023 7:56 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 11:19:15AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>
>>>> @@ -3133,6 +3133,72 @@ usb_1_role_switch: endpoint {
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> + usb_2: usb@...8800 {
>>>
>>> As I believe someone already pointed out, this node is not in sort order
>>> (i.e. it should go before usb@...8800).
>
>> I missed that message, but since I named it usb_2, so I placed it in
>> order after usb_1. Hope that is fine !!
>
> No, the nodes should be sorted by unit address so you need to move it.
>
Sure, in that case will put it in between usb_0 and usb_1 nodes.
>>>> + interrupts-extended = <&pdc 127 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>>>> + <&pdc 126 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
>>>> + <&pdc 16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>> + <&intc GIC_SPI 130 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>> + <&intc GIC_SPI 135 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>> + <&intc GIC_SPI 857 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>>> + <&intc GIC_SPI 856 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>>> +
>>>> + interrupt-names = "dp_hs_phy_irq",
>>>> + "dm_hs_phy_irq",
>>>> + "ss_phy_irq",
>>>> + "pwr_event_1",
>>>> + "pwr_event_2",
>>>> + "pwr_event_3",
>>>> + "pwr_event_4";
>
>>>> + interconnect-names = "usb-ddr", "apps-usb";
>>>
>>> Looks like 'wakeup-source' is missing here too.
>>>
>>
>> I believe this property was added to enable wakeup from system suspend
>> in host mode. I didn't add this property as currently I don't need to
>> support wakeup. If any requirement comes in future, then I might need to
>> add dp/dm interrupts (if any) for other ports as well and then need to
>> change driver code to enable/disable them on suspend/resume.
>
> If there are dp/dm/ss interrupts per ports then those need to be defined
> in the binding and devicetree from the start.
>
> Similar for 'wakeup-source' which indicates that the controller *can* be
> used to wakeup the system from suspend (which those pdc interrupts
> indicates).
>
> Remember that the devicetree is supposed to describe the hardware, and
> which features are currently supported in some version of software is
> mostly irrelevant.
>
> Johan
Can I take this up as a separate series (Wakeup support for multiport)
once this series is merged. If I am adding interrupts for other ports, I
can add driver code to handle those interrupts as well.
Regards,
Krishna,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists