[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230517150408.3411044-3-peterx@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 11:04:08 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, peterx@...hat.com,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm/uffd: Allow vma to merge as much as possible
We used to not pass in the pgoff correctly when register/unregister uffd
regions, it caused incorrect behavior on vma merging and can cause
mergeable vmas being separate after ioctls return.
For example, when we have:
vma1(range 0-9, with uffd), vma2(range 10-19, no uffd)
Then someone unregisters uffd on range (5-9), it should logically become:
vma1(range 0-4, with uffd), vma2(range 5-19, no uffd)
But with current code we'll have:
vma1(range 0-4, with uffd), vma3(range 5-9, no uffd), vma2(range 10-19, no uffd)
This patch allows such merge to happen correctly before ioctl returns.
This behavior seems to have existed since the 1st day of uffd. Since pgoff
for vma_merge() is only used to identify the possibility of vma merging,
meanwhile here what we did was always passing in a pgoff smaller than what
we should, so there should have no other side effect besides not merging
it. Let's still tentatively copy stable for this, even though I don't see
anything will go wrong besides vma being split (which is mostly not user
visible).
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Fixes: 86039bd3b4e6 ("userfaultfd: add new syscall to provide memory externalization")
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index 17c8c345dac4..4e800bb7d2ab 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -1332,6 +1332,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
bool basic_ioctls;
unsigned long start, end, vma_end;
struct vma_iterator vmi;
+ pgoff_t pgoff;
user_uffdio_register = (struct uffdio_register __user *) arg;
@@ -1484,8 +1485,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_register(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
vma_end = min(end, vma->vm_end);
new_flags = (vma->vm_flags & ~__VM_UFFD_FLAGS) | vm_flags;
+ pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff + ((start - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
prev = vma_merge(&vmi, mm, prev, start, vma_end, new_flags,
- vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file, vma->vm_pgoff,
+ vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file, pgoff,
vma_policy(vma),
((struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx){ ctx }),
anon_vma_name(vma));
@@ -1565,6 +1567,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_unregister(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
unsigned long start, end, vma_end;
const void __user *buf = (void __user *)arg;
struct vma_iterator vmi;
+ pgoff_t pgoff;
ret = -EFAULT;
if (copy_from_user(&uffdio_unregister, buf, sizeof(uffdio_unregister)))
@@ -1667,8 +1670,9 @@ static int userfaultfd_unregister(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
uffd_wp_range(vma, start, vma_end - start, false);
new_flags = vma->vm_flags & ~__VM_UFFD_FLAGS;
+ pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff + ((start - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
prev = vma_merge(&vmi, mm, prev, start, vma_end, new_flags,
- vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file, vma->vm_pgoff,
+ vma->anon_vma, vma->vm_file, pgoff,
vma_policy(vma),
NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX, anon_vma_name(vma));
if (prev) {
--
2.39.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists