[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45eb63c6-a147-776a-99b5-7ac06848ede8@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 10:44:43 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wubo.oduw@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] f2fs: pass I_NEW flag to trace event
On 2023/5/16 20:07, Wu Bo wrote:
> Modify the order between 'trace_f2fs_iget' & 'unlock_new_inode', so the
> I_NEW can pass to the trace event when the inode initialised.
Why is it needed? And trace_f2fs_iget() won't print inode->i_state?
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/inode.c b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> index cf4327ad106c..caf959289fe7 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/inode.c
> @@ -577,8 +577,8 @@ struct inode *f2fs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
> file_dont_truncate(inode);
> }
>
> - unlock_new_inode(inode);
> trace_f2fs_iget(inode);
> + unlock_new_inode(inode);
> return inode;
>
> bad_inode:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists